LGBTI-Gleichschaltung

Über "neue Menschenrechte"

[We can observe] the emergence of "new human rights" which, not being generally recognized as such, in fact stand in radical contradiction to "traditional" ethical and cultural values; and, consequently, are also in conflict with the existing domestic legislation and jurisprudence in most countries. They bespeak a "fourth generation" of human rights which, unlike the second and third generations, do not build on the first generation of "civil liberties" and complement them with social and economic entitlements, but are of a truly revolutionary nature: what was once considered a crime is to be transformed into a right, and what was once considered justice, into a human rights violation. —Jakob Cornides

Libidinis causa

In the course of few decades the radical homosexual activists have managed to adopt the terminology of human rights in order to make the way for their particular interests hence depriving the human rights of their true content. LGBTI campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of judicial activism^[cp]. In Roman law^[wp] this type of judicial activity made for the purpose of fullfiling the sensual lust and sexual bodily urges was titled Libidinis causa. The legal causes outwardly pretending the just cause but in fact hiding the real intentions and will of their originators were termed in Latin as Dissimulatio and Servius (Ulp. D.4,3,1,2) labeled them as deception (dolorum malum). Francis Bacon^[wp] regarded as negative phenomenon the dissimulation when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is [here: Human being^[wp] belonging to humankind^[wp] that consists of two complementary sexes - male and female]; and called as simulation the situation when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be [here: LGBT+], that he is not.

In his short satiric video sketch titled Modern Educayshun, Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschaltung disguised under the label of Gender equality delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and political correctness.

The most frequent terms in LGBTI gleichschaltung

"Gay rights"

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right^[wp]. This manipulative^[cp] effort often involves trickery that can be called LGBTI Bundling^[cp], tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In Bowers v. Hardwick^[cp], the US Supreme Court^[wp] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do, a right to engage in sodomitical conduct^[cp] and argue that it is "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition" or "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty", is, at best, facetious. The U.S. Constitution^[wp] does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy^[wp].

Sexual orientation

Siehe auch: Sexual orientation theory^[cp] - Theorie der sexuellen Orientierung

The term Sexual orientation is used by "gay" activists to deceive both policy makers and the public about the nature of homosexuality, which should be more accurately termed a sexual disorientation^[cp].{{Note group="note">Disorientation is the opposite of orientation. In more general sense, it is a cognitive disability in which the senses of time, direction, and recognition of items (things), people and places become difficult to distinguish/identify and can be due to various conditions, e.g. from delirium to intoxication. Typically, disorientation is first in time, then in place and finally in person. Mental disorientation is closely related, and often intermixed with trauma shock, including physical shock. In case of sexual disorientation, the cognitive disability pertains to recognition of own sexual identity, it can also be fueled by delirium and intoxication, and finally ends up in difficulties to properly distinguish/identify a person normal to mate with (i.e. focusing on individual(s) or object(s) other than person of the opposite sex of legal age instead, Siehe auch: Paraphilia^[cp]). With respect to sexual disorientation, the trauma shock often comes from child molestation^[cp] or sexual abuse^[cp], respectively. Sexual disorientation can be the aim of pressure groups spreading the homosexual agenda^[cp], in order to deliberately augment the misinterpretation of same-sex attractions^[cp] among children and young people by misusing the ideomotor effect^[cp].}} The LGBTI, or gender nonsensical theory about sexuality was invented by "gay" political strategists to serve their own selfish interests at the expense of the welfare of society as a whole. It helps to frame the debate about homosexuality in such a way that the average person is tricked into accepting "gay" presuppositions without challenge and even those people who continue to oppose the homosexuals' political goals start using their twisted language. Once the presuppositions have been accepted, especially when they become "law" in so called "anti-discrimination" policies, resistance to rest of the "gay" agenda^[cp] becomes much more difficult. The only effective counter-strategy is to reject and refute the false assumptions of sexual orientation and re-frame the issues on a truthful foundation.

Homophobia

Obszönität und Drogenmissbrauch hinter "Homophobie"-Erfindung
In 1966, while sitting in a bathtub after smoking half a joint[wp], Weinberg[wp] felt illuminated: "This is a f**king phobia!" Later, in 1971, he published Society and the Healthy Homosexual, which defined the "homophobia" condition as "the dread of being in close quarters with homosexuals." —About George Weinberg, "expert" of "gay liberation movement"

Homophobia is an obscure psychiatric term originally coined to define "a person's fear of his or her own same-sex attraction^[cp]." It has been redefined and misused by the political strategists of the "gay" movement such as George Weinberg^[wp] in order to ostracize all disapproval of homosexuality as a form of hatred and fear akin to mental illness^[cp] (a phobia is an anxiety disorder). The word "homophobia" is today not a scientific term, but a propaganda tool for psychological manipulation^[cp]. As a rhetorical weapon, it serves:

• first to define anyone who opposes the legitimization of homosexuality alias sodomy as a hate-filled bigot
• the term can be used as the semantic equivalent of "racist," helping the "gay" movement further indoctrinate the public with the notion that opposition to homosexuality is equivalent to prejudice against racial minorities
• collectively, the word "homophobia" serves pro-"gay" advocates to intimidate opponents into silence.
• Smith maintains that it can be regarded as a form of defence mechanism, a sort of guilt-shifting trickery^[cp] which is adopted immediately when initiator of this label comes short of arguments thus tries to sabotage any rational discourse

When any expression of opposition to homosexuality alias sodomy draws the accusation that one is a mentally-ill bigot equivalent to a racist, few people will venture to express their opposition to sodomical lifestyle publicly. Those who still will do, will also tend to be defensive, offering the disclaimer that they are not hateful, thus unintentionally but implicitly validating the lie that hatefulness and not valid objections is the general rule. The solution countering this LGBTI gleichschaltung is to reject the term "homophobia" itself as harmful and illegitimate. Its illegitimacy can be exposed by making the "gay" sophists define the term with emphasis on the distinction between "homophobia" and non-homophobic opposition to sodomical lifestyle based on presenting valid arguments, such as, for example, scientific thought experiments^[cp]. They will reveal that they accept no opposition to their agenda as legitimate.

Heterosexism

Heterosexism is another artificial word invetned by LGBTI political startegists and sex reformers. It has been designed to derogate the scientific conclusion^[cp] that natural family framed in traditional marriage of one man and one woman should be accepted as the best norm for society in order to ensure its integrity, and that this norm should be upheld and valued in social institutions, including public schools. Totalitarian supporters of gender ideology striving in their activism for acceptance of deviant sexual behaviours insist that words such as "wife," "husband," "father" and "mother" used in association with family life are "discriminatory" and should not be taught to children. They are trying to enforce into schools their politically correct educational programs, such as one called "Proud Schools" in Australia, thus advancing their political agenda under the fig leaf of promoting tolerance and an anti-bullying message.